Chinese Research Centres Recruiting British-Trained Tech Talent

Three state-funded Chinese institutes have posted job adverts this year targeting Chinese scientists in the UK in a bid to recruit high-tech talent.

The institutes, which advertised on the Chinese Embassy website, are looking for candidates for the National Natural Science Foundation’s (NSFC’s) Science Fund Programme for Distinguished Young Scholars (Overseas)—a recruitment and funding scheme similar to the so-called Thousand Talents Plan.

Vacancies are in areas such as marine environmental science and biomedical science to more sensitive fields such as semiconductors and advanced materials, although some technologies used in innocuous areas, such as remote sensing, also have military applications.

There’s no evidence to suggest that the recruitment campaigns are aimed at intellectual property theft or developing military capabilities, but they’ve raised concerns about British know-how being transferred to communist-controlled China.

Two Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)-affiliated institutes, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics (SINANO) and Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research (YIC), posted job adverts in Chinese only.

The three-year funding programme provides 1 to 3 million yuan (119,000 pounds to 359,000 pounds) per person, aiming to attract young and accomplished scientists who have the potential to become leading figures in their fields.

In total, YIC is promising successful applicants a competitive salary, housing, schooling and holiday benefits, and up to 4 million yuan (476,000 pounds) for research funding and expenses.

SINANO stated that successful applicants would get a salary of 700,000 yuan (83,800 pounds), at least 3.75 million yuan (450,000 pounds) in relocation and other expenses, at least 9 million yuan (1 million pounds) in research funding, temporary accommodation, and other benefits and rewards.

SINANO was also hiring researchers under other in-house schemes such as the CAS young talent programme, targeting those who have three years of work experience or are in key technology fields that are “urgently needed in an important national mission.”

Postdoctoral candidates are also promised opportunities to study abroad with state funding.

Among the 162 researchers listed on SINANO’s website, almost two-thirds listed studying or working experience outside mainland China or Hong Kong.

Alan Mendoza, co-founder and executive director of foreign affairs and defence think tank the Henry Jackson Society, said it’s a “difficult” area in which to balance risks.

“You want to have some scientific exchange, that’s important, but at the same time, you want to make sure that information is not taken from your capabilities to be used in a hostile way against you,” Mendoza told The Epoch Times.

He said it would be “a bit draconian” to impose a full-scale ban on Chinese students, but there “needs to be a better guide at this end about what sort of projects they could be working on.”

Benedict Rogers, co-founder of Hong Kong Watch and the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission, also believes that it’s neither practical nor desirable to impose a blanket ban, as students “shouldn’t be penalised or discriminated against solely on the basis of their nationality” but he also said that “much stronger background checks are needed, and universities should be more careful about offering places in certain disciplines.”

In an email to The Epoch Times, Rogers said it should be “no problem and might even be beneficial” to offer Chinese students places in humanities programmes, “but certain areas of the sciences and technology might merit some restrictions because we should not be transferring knowledge, wittingly or unwittingly, in sensitive areas where such knowledge may one day be used against us through espionage, hacking, military purposes, or in other ways.”

Rogers also called for the UK to be “much more cautious about research relationships between UK and Chinese institutions.”